Article
Details
Citation
Levati S, Campbell P, Frost R, Dougall N, Wells M, Donaldson C & Hagen S (2016) Optimisation of complex health interventions prior to a randomised controlled trial: a scoping review of strategies used. Pilot and Feasibility Studies, 2, Art. No.: 17. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40814-016-0058-y
Abstract
Background?
Many complex intervention trials fail to show an intervention effect. Although this may be due to genuine ineffectiveness, it may also be the result of sub-optimal intervention design, implementation failure or a combination of these. Given current financial constraints and the pressure to reduce waste and increase value in health services research, pre-trial strategies are needed to reduce the likelihood of design or implementation failure and to maximise the intervention¡¯s potential for effectiveness. In this scoping review, we aimed to identify and synthesise the available evidence relating to the strategies and methods used to ¡®optimise¡¯ complex interventions at the pre-trial stage.?
Methods?
We searched MEDLINE, CINAHL, AMED, PsycINFO and ProQuest Nursing & Allied Health Source for papers published between January 2000 and March 2015. We included intervention development and optimisation studies that explored potential intervention weaknesses and limitations before moving to a definitive randomised controlled trial (RCT). Two reviewers independently applied selection criteria and systematically extracted information relating to the following: study characteristics; intervention under development; framework used to guide the development process; areas of focus of the optimisation process, methods used and outcomes of the optimisation process. Data were tabulated and summarised in a narrative format.?
Results?
We screened 3968 titles and 231 abstracts for eligibility. Eighty-nine full-text papers were retrieved; 27 studies met our selection criteria. Optimisation strategies were used for a range of reasons: to explore the feasibility and acceptability of the intervention to patients and healthcare professionals; to estimate the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of different combinations of intervention components; and to identify potential barriers to implementation. Methods varied widely across studies, from interviews and focus groups to economic modelling and probability analysis.?
Conclusions?
The review identifies a range of optimisation strategies currently used. Although a preliminary classification of these strategies can be proposed, a series of questions remain as to which methods to use for different interventions and how to determine when the intervention is ready or ¡®optimised enough¡¯ to be tested in a RCT. Future research should explore potential answers to the questions raised, to guide researchers in the development and evaluation of more effective interventions.
Keywords
Complex interventions; Intervention development; Pre-trial; Optimisation; Modelling; Scoping review; Effectiveness; Acceptability
Journal
Pilot and Feasibility Studies: Volume 2
Status | Published |
---|---|
Publication date | 15/03/2016 |
Publication date online | 15/03/2016 |
Date accepted by journal | 02/03/2016 |
URL | |
Publisher | BioMed Central |
eISSN | 2055-5784 |
People (1)
Honorary Professor, CHeCR