Âé¶¹´«Ã½AV

Article

How not to Define Punishment

Details

Citation

Duff RA (2015) How not to Define Punishment. Philosophy and Public Issues, 5 (1), pp. 25-41. http://fqp.luiss.it/category/numero/2015-5-1/

Abstract
First paragraph: Brooks offers a critical survey of different normative theories of punishment, finding serious problems with them all, and argues that we should adopt ¡®the unified theory of punishment¡¯ that he draws from Hegel and the English Idealists. I had intended to focus this paper on ¡®the unified theory¡¯, to ask whether it is indeed both genuinely unified and plausible; but I was so taken aback by what Brooks says about the definition of punishment in the early pages of the Introduction that I have focused instead on that. It might seem misguided to devote so much attention to these first few pages: but if one is going to engage in definitional discussion, it is important to get it right.

Journal
Philosophy and Public Issues: Volume 5, Issue 1

StatusPublished
Publication date31/12/2015
URL
Publisher URL
ISSN1591-0660
eISSN2240-7987

People (1)

Professor Antony Duff

Professor Antony Duff

Emeritus Professor, Philosophy

Files (1)